binding affinity measurement of dusp18 and human gpr54 ct (CH Instruments)
Structured Review

Binding Affinity Measurement Of Dusp18 And Human Gpr54 Ct, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/binding affinity measurement of dusp18 and human gpr54 ct/product/CH Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Kisspeptin-10 binding to Gpr54 in osteoclasts prevents bone loss by activating Dusp18-mediated dephosphorylation of Src"
Article Title: Kisspeptin-10 binding to Gpr54 in osteoclasts prevents bone loss by activating Dusp18-mediated dephosphorylation of Src
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44852-9
Figure Legend Snippet: a – d Anti-Gpr54 IP was performed on WCL derived from RAW264.7 cells treated with indicated dose of Kp-10 for 20 min. Beads were analyzed by phosphatase activity assay ( a ), mass spectrometry assay ( b ), IB analysis ( c ) and quantification of protein levels ( d ). e , f Protein co-localization was analyzed by IF staining in primary pre-osteoclast with 10 nM Kp-10 treatment for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Gpr54 and Dusp18 were shown by TIRF microscopy ( e ), and MOC was used to quantify the degree of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( f ). Scale bar, 50 µm. g , h binding affinity was measured by SPR binding analysis. The binding affinity of DUSP18 and human GPR54 CT was measured at 40 nM, RUmax = 68.22, Chi = 1.01 ( g ), DUSP18 and mouse Gpr54 336–342 was measured at 1.8 µM, RUmax = 154.6, Chi = 3.42 ( h ). i – l IB and quantification of protein levels analysis of total samples and GST pull-downs using GST proteins including GST, GST-GPR54 CT, GST-GPR54 CT m1 (R336A&P339A), GST-GPR54 CT m2 (delta 339–344) incubated with WCL of 293 T cells transfected with DUSP18-HA ( i ) and quantification of protein levels ( j ), Total samples and GST pull-downs using His-SRC protein (0 or 0.1 μg) purified from Sf9 cells, His-DUSP18 (0, 0.1 or 0.2 μg), and GST proteins purified from E. coli ( k ) and quantification of protein levels ( l ). Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( a , d , j , l ) or two-tailed Student’s t -test ( f ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Phosphatase Assay, Mass Spectrometry, Staining, Microscopy, Binding Assay, Incubation, Transfection, Purification, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: a The binding affinity of DUSP18 and Src was measured at 5.9 nM (RUmax = 130.6, Chi = 3.42) by SPR binding analysis. b – f IB and quantification of protein co-IP levels. Anti-Flag IP derived from 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src and either DUSP18-Flag or DUSP18 (C104S)-Flag constructs with or without Kp-10 treatment for 20 min were lysed and subjected to anti-FLAG IP ( b ). Phosphatase reaction products using His-DUSP18 and His-DUSP18 (C104S) proteins purified from E. coli and SRC proteins purified from Sf9 insect cells ( c ) and quantification of protein levels ( d ). Anti-Src IP derived from RAW264.7 cells treated with or without Kp-10 treatment for 20 min were lysed and subjected to anti-Src IP ( e ) and quantification of protein levels ( f ). g , h Src and Dusp18 co-localization was analyzed by IF staining in primary pre-osteoclasts treated with 10 nM Kp-10 treatment for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Dusp18 and Src were shown by TIRF microscopy ( g ), and MOC was used to quantify the degree of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( h ). Scale bar, 50 µm. i – m IB and quantification of protein levels analysis. Anti-Flag IP derived from 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src, GPR54-myc, and either DUSP18-Flag or DUSP18 (C104S)-Flag constructs after Kp-10 treatment for 20 min ( i ) and quantification of protein levels ( j , k ). WCL derived from WT and Dusp18 −/− BMMs treated with or without Kp-10 for 20 min ( l ) and quantification of protein levels ( m ). n , o WT and Dusp18 −/− BMMs were cultured in vitro on dentin slices, and after incubation with M-CSF (10 ng/ml) and RANKL (50 ng/ml) for 5–7 days, the pits formed by osteoclast absorption activity were scanned by confocal microscopy (XY and z sections). Scale bars, 125 µm ( n ), and pits depth were quantified by confocal microscopy ( o ). Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( d , f , j , k , m , o ) or by two-tailed Student’s t -test ( h ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Derivative Assay, Transfection, Construct, Purification, Staining, Microscopy, Cell Culture, In Vitro, Incubation, Activity Assay, Confocal Microscopy, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: a , b IB analysis of lysates from RAW264.7 with indicated dose of Kp-10 treatment for 1 h ( a ) and quantification results ( b ). c Quantitative PCR of Dusp18 mRNA in RAW264.7 cells treated with inhibitors of PLC (U73122, 10 µM), PKC (Staurosporine, 0.25 µM), ERK (LY3214996, 20 µM), and P38 (SB203580, 10 µM) for 1 h, and then incubated with indicated dose of Kp-10 for 30 min. d – i Anti-Flag IP of lysates derived from 293 T cells transfected with indicated constructs and treated with PLC inhibitor (U73122, 10 µM), PKC inhibitor (Staurosporine, 0.25 µM), ERK inhibitor (LY3214996, 10 µM), Ca2+/CaMKII inhibitor (KN-93, 10 µM), and Src inhibitor (Saracatinib, 10 µM) for 1 h and then stimulated with 10 nM Kp-10 for 20 min. Anti-Flag IP of lysates derived from 293 T cells transfected with GPR54-flag and Src-HA constructs ( d ) and quantification results ( e ). Anti-Flag IP of lysates derived from 293 T cells transfected with GPR54-flag and DUSP18-HA constructs ( f ) and quantification results ( g ). Anti-Flag IP of lysates derived from 293 T cells transfected with Src-HA, and DUSP18-flag constructs ( h ) and quantification results ( i ). j , k IB analysis of lysates derived from WT BMMs and Gq/11 KO BMMs with or without Kp-10 treatment for 1 h ( j ) and quantification of results ( k ). l Working model of Kp-10 /Gpr54 mediated Src dephosphorylation. Low dose of Kp-10 (0.1, 1 nM) induced the expression of Dusp18 obviously but not by 10 nM Kp-10, which is dependent on Gq/11 signaling. However, both active Src and DUSP18 were recruited by GPR54 through the PR motif in GPR54 CT along with the increase of Kp-10 dose (1, 10 nM). Therefore, phosphorylation of Src was dose dependently suppressed when GPR54 was activated by Kp-10. Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( b , c , e , g , i , k ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Incubation, Derivative Assay, Transfection, Construct, De-Phosphorylation Assay, Expressing, Phospho-proteomics
Figure Legend Snippet: a , c , e , g , i , k Representative micro-CT images of femoral trabecular bone and cortical bone. 4-month-old WT and Gpr54 cKO mice ( n = 7 per group including 4 female and 3 male mice) ( a , c ), 4-month-old WT and Kiss1 cKO mice ( n = 6 per group including 3 female and 3 male mice) ( e , g ) and 8-week-old WT and Dusp18 −/− mice with or without treatment of KX2-391 or (DSS)*6-KP-10 ( n = 7 for WT mice including 3 female and 4 male mice, n = 5 for each other group including 2 female and 3 male Dusp18 −/− mice) ( i , k ). Scale bar, 500 µm. b , d , f , h , j , l Bone parameters analysis of femurs from the mice above. 2-month-old WT and Gpr54 cKO mice ( b , d ), 4-month-old WT and Kiss1 cKO mice ( f , h ), 4-month-old and Dusp18 −/− mice ( j , l ). BMD bone mineral density, BV/TV bone volume as a fraction of total bone volume, Tb.Th trabecular thickness, Tb.N trabecular number, Tb.Sp trabecular separation. m , o , q Representative TRAP staining images of femurs from the mice above. 4-month-old and Gpr54 cKO mice ( m ), 4-month-old and Kiss1 cKO mice ( o ) and 4-month-old and Dusp18 −/− mice ( q ). Scale bar, 200 µm. n , p , r Osteoclast parameters analysis of femurs from the mice above. 4-month-old WT and Gpr54 cKO mice ( n ), 4-month-old and Kiss1 cKO mice ( p ), 4-month-old and Dusp18 −/− mice ( r ). Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by two-tailed Student’s t -test ( b , d , f , h , n , p ) or one-way ANOVA analysis ( j , l , r ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Micro-CT, Staining, Two Tailed Test